nanog mailing list archives
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:58:45 -0800
On Feb 21, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: arin-ppml-bounces () arin net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces () arin net] On Behalf Of Chris Grundemann Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 5:55 PM To: Benson Schliesser Cc: NANOG list; ARIN-PPML List Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:17, Benson Schliesser <bensons () queuefull net> wrote:If you have more experience (not including rumors) that suggestsotherwise, I'd very much like to hear about it. I'm open to the possibility that NAT444 breaks stuff - that feels right in my gut - but I haven't found any valid evidence of this. In case you have not already found this: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01That document conflates problems of NAT444 with problems of NAT44 with problems of bandwidth starvation with problems of CGN. For details, see my comments at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave/current/msg09027.html and see Reinaldo Penno's comments at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave/current/msg09030.html -d
The document describes problems that will exist in NAT444 environments. It does not state that these problems would be specific to NAT444, but, NAT444 will cause or exacerbate each of the problems described. Yes, the problems may have other underlying root causes, but, they will all be present in a NAT444 environment, even if they were not present in the same environment prior to deployment of NAT444. Let me put it this way... IPv4 has a TITANIC lack of numeric addresses and has been stretched beyond its limits for some time now. IPv6 is a life boat. NAT is a seat cushion used for floatation. NAT444 (and other NAT-based extensions) are deck chairs. Attempting to improve them beyond their current states is an effort to rearrange the deck chairs. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer..., (continued)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jens Link (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jens Link (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Benson Schliesser (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jack Bates (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Benson Schliesser (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jack Bates (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Owen DeLong (Feb 10)
- NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 10)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Chris Grundemann (Feb 17)
- RE: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Dan Wing (Feb 21)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 21)
- RE: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Dan Wing (Feb 21)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Chris Grundemann (Feb 21)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 22)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Randy Bush (Feb 22)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 22)
- RE: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Tony Hain (Feb 22)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 22)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Owen DeLong (Feb 22)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Randy Bush (Feb 22)
- Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...) Benson Schliesser (Feb 22)