nanog mailing list archives
Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:08:19 +0100
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:07:26AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
Double NAT prevents most of the work arounds working.
And quite important for residential ISPs of some size: have fun teaching your call centers diagnosing double-NAT failure modes. NAT444 is a hell I don't want to visit really. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- RE: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer..., (continued)
- RE: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... George Bonser (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jens Link (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jeroen van Aart (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Adam Atkinson (Feb 12)
- RE: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... George Bonser (Feb 12)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 12)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Joel Jaeggli (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... TR Shaw (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jeroen van Aart (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Mark Andrews (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Daniel Roesen (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jens Link (Feb 10)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jack Bates (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Owen DeLong (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jack Bates (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Jack Bates (Feb 09)
- Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer... Mark Andrews (Feb 09)