nanog mailing list archives
RE: Sad IPv4 story?
From: "Vitkovsky, Adam" <avitkovsky () emea att com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:17:08 +0100
and models that doesn't take "we may not get IPv4 space" into account and have a contingency plan for that *deserves* to be soundly mocked and ridiculed in public.
That's right However the original post was concerning a fresh new ISP that can't run their business the way they would like Maybe they'd like to build an mpls core which right now is not possible with only ipv6 at hand I'd like to see the business model to build an mpls network with all the features we're used to -but solely on ipv6 -I guess the plan would be let's wait a couple years till it gets implemented and mature enough
Current thread:
- Re: Sad IPv4 story?, (continued)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? bmanning (Dec 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Keegan Holley (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Barry Shein (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Philip Dorr (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jimmy Hess (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Eric Parsonage (Dec 11)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 12)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Leigh Porter (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Roland Perry (Dec 17)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Tinka (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jared Mauch (Dec 13)