nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:14:19 +0900
So far the IPv6 party's been pretty small due to the expense of the rocket ship upgrades required to reach the planet that party is going to be held on.
for those of us who have been here on B-612 nuturing the rose for over a decade, you 'adult' geographers seem to live on a very grey and depressing asteroid. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Sad IPv4 story?, (continued)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Keegan Holley (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? bmanning (Dec 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Keegan Holley (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? bmanning (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Keegan Holley (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Barry Shein (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Philip Dorr (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jimmy Hess (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 09)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Eric Parsonage (Dec 11)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 12)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Leigh Porter (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Roland Perry (Dec 17)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Tinka (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)