nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management...
From: Matthew Topper <topperm9 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:23:12 -0400
Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, but it seems to be that that would be a huge problem when you need to change out a cable or move something. Do the benefits outweigh the headaches with this kind of setup? On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 21/09/2010 06:07, Positively Optimistic wrote:Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on 6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to be a great idea... 8 48port blades.. pose a challenge.. or a problem..courtesy of Richard Steenbergen: http://cluepon.net/ras/betterfiber.jpg Nick
Current thread:
- Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Positively Optimistic (Sep 20)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Nick Hilliard (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Topper (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Seth Mattinen (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Topper (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... William Herrin (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Seth Mattinen (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dylan Ebner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Brandon Applegate (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Chuck Anderson (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Tony Thornton (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dantzig, Brian (Sep 21)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Nick Hilliard (Sep 21)