nanog mailing list archives
Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net?
From: Dave Sparro <dsparro () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:29:09 -0400
On 5/15/2010 6:38 PM, Graham Freeman wrote:
That may be, but it would surprise me. The carriers still get paid
> by virtue of charging the recipients for the SMSes, and in this > particular case cutting off this line of communication
is leaving money on the table, as email->SMS deliverability is desired yet optional/secondary functionality of the app.
Based on what I see in the marketplace today, I think that the average wireless carrier exec doesn't do the same math. For them, I think it's more like:
Q: What's better than a service we can charge our users for?A: A service we can charge our users for, while at the same time charging somebody else.
Current thread:
- Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Al Iverson (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 15)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 15)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Dave Sparro (May 17)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 17)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? J.D. Falk (May 17)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Tim Franklin (May 17)