nanog mailing list archives
Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net?
From: Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 08:51:10 +0000 (GMT)
That may be, but it would surprise me. The carriers still get paid by virtue of charging the recipients for the SMSes, and in this particular case cutting off this line of communication is leaving money on the table, as email->SMS deliverability is desired yet optional/secondary functionality of the app.
Paying to *receive* SMS? And I thought the UK mobile industry was doing a good job of screwing its customers... In all seriousness, I wonder if they're using the same platform for their email gateways world-wide, and / or rate-limiting globally on the assumption that they're *not* making any money, as would be the case in many other locations? Especially if the Tmobile US operation is tech-driven (or otherwise) from the German parent. Regards, Tim.
Current thread:
- Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Al Iverson (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 15)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 15)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Dave Sparro (May 17)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 17)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? J.D. Falk (May 17)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Graham Freeman (May 14)
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Jaren Angerbauer (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Contacts re email deliverability problem to tmomail.net? Tim Franklin (May 17)