nanog mailing list archives

Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course


From: Jens Link <lists () quux de>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:13:07 +0200

Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> writes:

RFC4193 + NAT quite simply is what they know and are comfortable with. 

NAT is *not simple*. NAT adds one more layer of complexity. When
using multiple NAT things get worse. 

In most cases people don't want or need NAT they are just used to it and
old habits die hard.

Jens
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Foelderichstr. 40   | 13595 Berlin, Germany    | +49-151-18721264     |
| http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink () guug de | -------------------  | 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: