nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:18:07 +1030
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:04:26 +0000 "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Mark Smith wrote:That's a new bit of FUD. References?It isn't 'FUD'. redistribute connected.
In my opinion it's better not to do blind redistribution. More control means less things that are unexpected or or can be forgotten. That being said, I don't understand why that's a problem, and why that problem doesn't already exist in IPv4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice. -- H.L. Mencken
Current thread:
- Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mathias Seiler (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links David Freedman (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Ron Bonica (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 26)