nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:04:26 +0000
On Jan 24, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
That's a new bit of FUD. References?
It isn't 'FUD'. redistribute connected. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice. -- H.L. Mencken
Current thread:
- Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mathias Seiler (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links David Freedman (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Ron Bonica (Jan 26)