nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:50:00 +0000
On Jan 23, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/20788
A couple of points for thought: 1. Yes, the IPv6 address space is unimaginably huge. Even so, when every molecule in every soda can in the world has its own IPv6 address in years to come, it might not seem so big. 2. A more immediate concern with using things like /64s or whatever on p2p links is inadvertently turning routers into sinkholes. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice. -- H.L. Mencken
Current thread:
- Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mathias Seiler (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links David Freedman (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)