nanog mailing list archives
Re: I don't need no stinking firewall!
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 21:08:28 +0000
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Peter Hicks wrote:
Is that really stateful inspection? Isn't the SMTP fixup on a PIX an application-level gateway?
Well, the bug I described is caused by it not being stateful enough.
I *though* most of the world turns SMTP fixup off because it's naff.
Exactly my point :-) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall!, (continued)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Simon Lockhart (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 05)
- RE: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jason Shearer (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Henry Yen (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 05)
- Message not available
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 07)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Henry Yen (Jan 11)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Simon Lockhart (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Peter Hicks (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Brielle Bruns (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Tony Finch (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Mark Smith (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! William Herrin (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Sean Donelan (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! William Herrin (Jan 05)