nanog mailing list archives
Re: I don't need no stinking firewall!
From: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks () poggs co uk>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:01:27 +0000
Tony Finch wrote:
Stateful inspection is useful for breaking things in subtle and hard-to-debug ways.
>
http://fanf.livejournal.com/102206.html http://fanf.livejournal.com/95831.html
Is that really stateful inspection? Isn't the SMTP fixup on a PIX an application-level gateway?
I *though* most of the world turns SMTP fixup off because it's naff. Peter
Current thread:
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall!, (continued)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! juttazalud (Jan 06)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Dobbins, Roland (Jan 06)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Simon Lockhart (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 05)
- RE: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jason Shearer (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Henry Yen (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 05)
- Message not available
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Jay Hennigan (Jan 07)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Henry Yen (Jan 11)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Peter Hicks (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Brielle Bruns (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Tony Finch (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Mark Smith (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! William Herrin (Jan 05)
- Re: I don't need no stinking firewall! Sean Donelan (Jan 05)