nanog mailing list archives
Re: dns interceptors
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:54:57 +1100
In message <alpine.GSO.2.00.1002141746410.9929 () clifden donelan com>, Sean Donel an writes:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Randy Bush wrote:ssh tunnels to IP addressi am often on funky networks in funky places. e.g. the wireless in changi really sucked friday night. if i ssh tunneled, it would multiply the suckiness as tcp would have puked at the loss rate. smb whacked me that i should use non-tcp tunnels.Their network, their rules; your network, your rules; my network, my rules.
There is also "truth in advertising" laws. If they advertise "Internet" access then you should get the "Internet" not a cut down / filtered version. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: dns interceptors, (continued)
- Re: dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors Jason Frisvold (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Jason Frisvold (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors John Levine (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Larry Sheldon (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Bill Weiss (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 13)
- RE: dns interceptors Justin Krejci (Feb 18)
- Re: dns interceptors Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Mark Andrews (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Steven Bellovin (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] John Levine (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Brandon Galbraith (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Barry Shein (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Tony Finch (Feb 15)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Randy Bush (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jay Hennigan (Feb 13)