nanog mailing list archives
Re: dns interceptors
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 14 Feb 2010 20:47:13 -0000
Hrm.. Maybe I misunderstood. Are the packets being intercepted, or is the problem the local resolvers?
Both, probably. Hotel networks often intercept all port 53 traffic not out of malice, but so that they won't get support calls from people whose PCs have poorly configured DNS often pointing at caches that won't accept requests from random places. Of course, once they do that, it's hard to resist the pressure from the marketers to Enance their User Experience. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: dns interceptors, (continued)
- Re: dns interceptors Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Bill Thompson (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Jim Richardson (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors Oliver Gorwits (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors Jason Frisvold (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Jason Frisvold (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors John Levine (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Larry Sheldon (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Bill Weiss (Feb 14)
- RE: dns interceptors Justin Krejci (Feb 18)
- Re: dns interceptors Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Mark Andrews (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Steven Bellovin (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] John Levine (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Brandon Galbraith (Feb 12)