nanog mailing list archives
Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:12:55 -0500
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:02:48 +0800, "Wilkinson, Alex" said:
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation
Have fun trying to enforce that after posting to a public mailing list in North America, with recipients all over the world. Care to cite any relevant legal basis for the claim that would hold outside Australia?
If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
Consider yourself notified, as obviously you sent it to the NANOG list in error if you thought you were retaining ownership of the mail. Are you planning to reimburse us all for the costs of making sure that mail is *really* deleted so a forensics expert can't recover it, off every single mail server it hit along the way? I wonder if the Australian legal system has the concept of "overwarning"...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: dns interceptors, (continued)
- Re: dns interceptors Larry Sheldon (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Bill Weiss (Feb 14)
- RE: dns interceptors Justin Krejci (Feb 18)
- Re: dns interceptors Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Mark Andrews (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Steven Bellovin (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] John Levine (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Brandon Galbraith (Feb 12)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Barry Shein (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Tony Finch (Feb 15)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Randy Bush (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Jay Hennigan (Feb 13)
- Re: dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Larry Brower (Feb 14)
- Re: dns interceptors Randy Bush (Feb 14)