nanog mailing list archives

Re: wikileaks unreachable


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:39:47 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com> wrote:

But Jorge has a point.  If they wanted to help users get past their DNS
problems, they could tweet for assistance, tweet their IP addy and ask
to be re-tweeted, ask owners of authorities to set up wikileaks.$FOO.com
to 'crowd source' their name, etc.

I'll just point to an article I found very interesting about this matter:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101202/02243512089/how-response-to-wik
ileaks-is-exactly-what-assange-wants.shtml

Aren't we being part of some kind of action-reaction game to produce
systematic changes as side effects ?

Yes.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFM+JCrq1pz9mNUZTMRAje8AKCSOUdPNKMKhomYOavcAQWeLU9gLwCfTc7W
fvFnKA/JRZAOXZ9VMO2zM+k=
=3+y3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: