nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: // ravi <ravi-lists () g8o net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:38:31 -0500
On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
and this is based on what facts?Instead of tweeting about how to reach their content, or their IP addresses to bypass DNS [snip happens]
http://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/10621245489938433 7 hours ago (Randy, I plan/hope to requote your earlier message — non-commercial use — with attribution) —ravi
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable, (continued)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Mikhail Strizhov (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Paul Ferguson (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Christopher Morrow (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable // ravi (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Zaid Ali (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Christopher Morrow (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 03)
- Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Peter Dambier (Dec 06)
- RE: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Jay Mitchell (Dec 06)
- Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Simon Waters (Dec 06)
- RE: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Nathan Eisenberg (Dec 06)
- Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Joe Greco (Dec 06)