nanog mailing list archives
Re: PacketShader
From: "nanogf ." <nanogf () spoofer com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:18:58 -0700
--- Joel Jaeggli wrote:
What it really comes down to is packets per watt or packets per dollar, if it's cheaper to do it this way then people will, if not > BFD.
http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://ic.ese.upenn.edu/pdf/spice_fpl2009.pdf Performance Comparison of Single-Precision SPICE Model-Evaluation on FPGA, GPU, Cell, and multi-core Processors _____________________________________________________________ Get your own *free* email address like this one from www.OwnEmail.com
Current thread:
- Re: PacketShader, (continued)
- Re: PacketShader Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Mark Smith (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Jim Shankland (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Kevin Oberman (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Randy Bush (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Mark Smith (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Andrew Kirch (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Owen DeLong (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)