nanog mailing list archives
Re: PacketShader
From: William Pitcock <nenolod () systeminplace net>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:55:39 -0500
Vyatta's commercial products (the bundles with OS+Hardware) come with adequate support in my experience. William (Sorry for topposting. The android email experience is depressingly lacking.) Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net> wrote:
On 8/23/2010 1:17 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:What it really comes down to is packets per watt or packets per dollar, if it's cheaper to do it this way then people will, if not BFD.I disagree here. Core routing isn't purchased based on cost, it's purchased based on support. People have not adopted Vayetta, or Mikrotik or many of the other small routing platforms which are in fact MUCH cheaper than the bridge or the tree (cisco or juniper), and the reason is simply support. If my router breaks beyond my ability to fix it I have a certified engineer (of some value or other) at my site with parts to fix it within 4 hours. This is why people go with Cisco and Juniper. It's also a mechanism of CYA. Would we rather tell our boss that the company has responded and dropped the replacement part in the mail, or that a technician from the router supplier is on their way and will be here very shortly, and ooh, by the way, you did recommend redundant hardware when the piece that broke was purchased, and it was available at a discount. Andrew
Current thread:
- PacketShader Michael Painter (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Mark Smith (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Jim Shankland (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Kevin Oberman (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Randy Bush (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Mark Smith (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Andrew Kirch (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Owen DeLong (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PacketShader William Pitcock (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader nanogf . (Aug 26)