nanog mailing list archives
Re: PacketShader
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:25:05 +0900
Really, in this day and age, a chassis throughput of 100G is pretty trivial. When you start getting up to the Tbps range on a system using "standard components", then I'll be really interested.
i suspect that a rule of thumb is that leading edge home appliances are one decimal digit behind leading edge routers and cost two decimal digits less. so it's a trade-off. which is why we get the big bucks. randy
Current thread:
- PacketShader Michael Painter (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Mark Smith (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Jim Shankland (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Kevin Oberman (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Randy Bush (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Mark Smith (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Andrew Kirch (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Owen DeLong (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader Joel Jaeggli (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PacketShader William Pitcock (Aug 23)
- Re: PacketShader nanogf . (Aug 26)