nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:01:36 -0700
On 4/3/2010 6:15 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
Ever used IPX or Appletalk? If you haven't, then you don't know how simple and capable networking can be. And those protocols were designed more than 20 years ago, yet they're still more capable than IPv4.
Zing, and there you have it! The hourglass is thin in the middle. One of if not the defining propteries of the ip protocol is what it doesn't do, which is virtually everything.
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Barak (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Vadim Antonov (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Adrian Chadd (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Dan White (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Vadim Antonov (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 James Hess (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Stephen Repetski (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Frank Bulk (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 William Warren (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)