nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Sat, 4/3/10, Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org> wrote:
To: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>No. But that isn't the point. The point isthat v6 was a bad solutionto the problem. Rather than simply address theaddress depletionproblem, it also "solves" a lot of problems thatnobody has whilecreating a whole bunch more that we will have.Ever used IPX or Appletalk? If you haven't, then you don't know how simple and capable networking can be. And those protocols were designed more than 20 years ago, yet they're still more capable than IPv4.
Spoken like someone who has forgotten how much {fun|trouble} cable range + zones were... IPX, AppleTalk, VINES, DECNet, SNA, and all of the other protocol suites which were kicking around in the 80s and early 90s each had the "one thing they do really really well," but none of them were sufficiently flexible, extensible, easy, or cheap to capture the market. Examples of some things which those protocols *didn't* do well include (obviously the list is different for each individual protocol): * interdomain routing - most were optimized for single-administrative control networks * multicast * handle an encryption layer at layer 3 * cheap + easy to implement, no license required * distributed centralized administration (i.e. DHCP servers) * tolerate a wide variety of {link|connection} performance characteristics
I think IPv6 has not just learnt from the history of IPv4, it has also learnt from the history of other protocols.
Sadly, though, it also picked up some of the mistaken optimizations from the other protocols. The mess that has been made of RA+SLAAC+DHCPv6+DNS is something which can't be described as "elegant," and I certainly don't find it an improvement over IPv4 DHCP+DNS. David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Barak (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Vadim Antonov (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Adrian Chadd (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Dan White (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Vadim Antonov (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 James Hess (Apr 03)