nanog mailing list archives
RE: legacy /8
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 10:31:31 -0700
-----Original Message----- From: Larry Sheldon [mailto:LarrySheldon () cox net] Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 8:43 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: legacy /8 On 4/3/2010 10:34, Michael Dillon wrote:That adoption is so low at this point really says that it hasfailed.In the real world, there is no success or failure, only next steps. At this point, IPv4 has failed,Failed? Really?!!?!
Failed in the sense that I am not sure there is enough time left to really get v6 deployment going before we hit the wall. It is like skydiving and waiting too long to open the chute. Any school teaching v4 at this point other than as a legacy protocol that they teach on the second year because "they might see it in the wild" should be closed down. All new instruction that this point should begin and end with v6 with v4 as an "aside". But that isn't.
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 Jim Burwell (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Barak (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Smith (Apr 03)