![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:51:35 +0200 (CEST)
Like I said, if there's a bunch of routers announcing their presence and you want a DHCP option to provide guidance to a host as to which one to choose, that would be fine. But pointing to a potentially non- existing address in the hopes that there will magically be a router residing at that address would a serious regression in robustness.It really isn't a serious regression in robustness in the real world. It really is functioning today. Most DHCP servers are not used to shoot users in the head, despite your claims to the contrary.
This to me is one of the least credible claims of the RA/SLAAC crowd. On the one hand we have carriers around the world with millions and millions of customers getting default routes and other config through DHCPv4 every day. And most of the time it actually works very well! On the other hand we have RA/SLAAC with a vastly smaller customer base, vastly less real life testing - but which is still claimed to be so much better that DHCPv6 is not *allowed* to get a default route option. The mind boggles. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Kevin Loch (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Conrad (Oct 22)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Tony Hain (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Conrad (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Adrian Chadd (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN sthaug (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Leo Bicknell (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Leo Bicknell (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chuck Anderson (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN John Payne (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Dan White (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David W. Hankins (Oct 22)