nanog mailing list archives
Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:54:30 -0400
On Oct 22, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
Knowing about it the instant it happens might even be better than slowly coming to the realization that you're dealing with one.
Might just be me, but I'm more worried about the rogue RA (or DHCPv4) server that does not disrupt communication at all...
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Adrian Chadd (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN sthaug (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Leo Bicknell (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Leo Bicknell (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chuck Anderson (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN John Payne (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Dan White (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David W. Hankins (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Perry Lorier (Oct 22)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David W. Hankins (Oct 23)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Joel Jaeggli (Oct 24)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 24)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mark Smith (Oct 25)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Scott Morris (Oct 25)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Matthew Petach (Oct 26)
- Re: {SPAM?} Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 22)