nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP customer assignments
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:36:02 -0700
Chris Adams wrote:
I guess I'm missing something; what in section 3 is this referring to? I can understand /64 or /126 (or maybe /124 if you were going to delegate reverse DNS?), but why /112 and "16 bits for node identifiers" on a point-to-point link?
It falls on a 16 bit boundry and is therefore easy to read. some numbering concessions within a vast space exist for the convenience of the poor humans not the machines. I can pick out the host side of the address in a /64 no problem but for some reason I have a trouble finding subnet boundaries on a series of /93s.
Current thread:
- Re: ISP customer assignments, (continued)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Chris Adams (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Dillon (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Chris Adams (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Dave Temkin (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Rob Evans (Oct 16)
- Re: ISP customer assignments William Herrin (Oct 15)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Tore Anderson (Oct 16)
- RE: ISP customer assignments Wouter de Jong (Oct 14)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Joel Jaeggli (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Justin Shore (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Dillon (Oct 13)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Bill Stewart (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP customer assignments bmanning (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Nathan Ward (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Bill Stewart (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Karl Auer (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Mark Andrews (Oct 20)