nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream BGP community support
From: Steve Meuse <smeuse () mara org>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:33:07 -0500
Jack Bates expunged (jbates () brightok net):
I think creating a standard or at least a template might push more people to adopt communities support and to use them.
I put this up there with trynig to define inter-provider QoS. You are never going to get two business to agree to the same model.....and after all, community support is basically a business tool. I know from experience that some providers deliberately constrain their community support for business purposes, this goes back 10+ years..... -Steve
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream BGP community support, (continued)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Andy B. (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Steve Meuse (Nov 05)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jack Bates (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Joel Jaeggli (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jack Bates (Nov 02)
- RE: Upstream BGP community support Brian Dickson (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Steve Meuse (Nov 05)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jack Bates (Nov 05)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support joel jaeggli (Nov 03)