nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream BGP community support
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:50:10 +0100
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:06:56PM -0600, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Definitely a problem. The point of using 65123:45678 in the first place (with a private ASN field in the "AS part") is to avoid stepping on anyone else's ASN with your internal use community.
Actually, as far as I have seen yet, it's more like being able to derrive/describe community from ASN-to-act-on, e.g. 61234 meaning "prepend 3 times" 45678 meaning "this is the neighbor AS I want this to be applied to" Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream BGP community support, (continued)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Joel Jaeggli (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jack Bates (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Joel Jaeggli (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jack Bates (Nov 02)
- RE: Upstream BGP community support Brian Dickson (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Steve Meuse (Nov 05)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jack Bates (Nov 05)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Jack Bates (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Joel Jaeggli (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Daniel Roesen (Nov 05)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 05)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Daniel Roesen (Nov 06)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 06)
- Re: Upstream BGP community support joel jaeggli (Nov 03)