nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamhaus drop list
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:44:13 -0400
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:04:50PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
Not that I've ever seen. Nobody else has the breadth of data that Spamhaus does. I've been using it for ages and based on zero complaints, it's never blocked anything that any of my users wanted.
I strongly concur with John: using the Spamhaus DROP list is incredibly effective not just against spam but against many other forms of abuse. I use a script to update various routers/firewalls/mail systems once a week, and there have been no problems of any kind with it. ---Rsk
Current thread:
- Re: spamhaus drop list, (continued)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Chris Adams (Jun 15)
- Message not available
- RE: spamhaus drop list Quinn Mahoney (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list sthaug (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list J.D. Falk (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list John Levine (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Bret Clark (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Rich Kulawiec (Jun 18)
- RE: spamhaus drop list Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Sean Donelan (Jun 17)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 17)