nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamhaus drop list
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:08:47 +0200 (CEST)
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not satisfied with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
Obviously the Spamhaus DROP list should be evaluated - you should not use such lists unreservedly. That said, the Spamhaus DROP list contains entries that *are* verifiably bad, e.g. the well published Cernel 85.255.112.0/20 prefix. Regarding the extraordinary claim - consider the possibility that Nanog has its share of kooks. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- spamhaus drop list Quinn Mahoney (Jun 15)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Fred Baker (Jun 15)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Chris Adams (Jun 15)
- Message not available
- RE: spamhaus drop list Quinn Mahoney (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list sthaug (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Peter Dambier (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list J.D. Falk (Jun 17)
- RE: spamhaus drop list Quinn Mahoney (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list John Levine (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Bret Clark (Jun 16)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Rich Kulawiec (Jun 18)
- Re: spamhaus drop list Fred Baker (Jun 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: spamhaus drop list Michiel Klaver (Jun 17)
- RE: spamhaus drop list Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 17)