nanog mailing list archives

Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming

From: Charles Wyble <charles () thewybles com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:17:07 -0700



jamie wrote:

puck.nether.net <http://puck.nether.net>.


Right. That's what I meant.


way to volunteer someone else's box :-)


Good point. My apologies.

Google groups then. :)

Current thread:

Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed., (continued)
- - - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 27)
    - RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Hiers, David (Jul 27)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 27)
    - RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
    - Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 27)
    - RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
    - OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Hiers, David (Jul 28)
    - Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
    - Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming AMuse (Jul 28)
    - Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming jamie (Jul 28)
    - Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
    - RE: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Hiers, David (Jul 29)