nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:00:05 -0700
Richard Bennett wrote:
In the case of the ISPs and carriers who blocked access to 4chan for a while Sunday, since that was done in accordance with DDOS mitigation, there's not any issue as far as the FCC is concerned, but that hasn't prevented the usual parties from complaining about censorship, etc.
If someone came out and said "Hey, DDOS mitigation, please hold!" that would be cool, too. Based on the content of 4chan, it's either DDOS or someone cried about the content. It looked like the latter. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed., (continued)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. William Pitcock (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Andrew D Kirch (Jul 26)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Kody Riker (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. chris rollin (Jul 26)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Jon Lewis (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. John C. A. Bambenek (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 27)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Hiers, David (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 27)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
- Re: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Seth Mattinen (Jul 27)
- RE: AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed. Richard Bennett (Jul 27)
- OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Hiers, David (Jul 28)
- Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
- Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming AMuse (Jul 28)
- Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming jamie (Jul 28)
- Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
- RE: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming Hiers, David (Jul 29)