Re: OT: Voice Operators' Group forming

[AMuse <nanog-amuse () foofus com>]

I second the idea of google groups or some other group provider;  Yahoo 
groups are known within many circles for having long email delays.


Charles Wyble wrote:
> Hiers, David wrote:
> > Hi NANOG,
> > I'd like to announce the formation of a NANOG-knockoff group for 
> > voice operators, the Voice Operators' Group.
>
> Very cool! :)
>
> > Voice network operators share many of the same challenges as IP 
> > network operators; we register with registrars (CILLI, OCN, and ACNA 
> > as well as ASN and DNS), route traffic (point codes as well as IP 
> > addresses), resolve names (CNAM as well as DNS), manage reachability 
> > (to countries, LATAs and NPA/NXXs as well as  to IP networks), and 
> > deal with equipment issues.
>
> Indeed we do!
> > NANOG has been so useful at the IP layer that it seems like a good 
> > idea to try to duplicate it a little further up the stack.  
>
>
> Yep.
>
> > For now, the group is on Yahoo:
> >
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/voip_operators_group/
> >
> > Of course, we're looking for a better place, name, and charter.
>
> Might I recommend google groups, or puck.nether.org. An IPTV list was 
> recently formed.
>
> NAVOG  works for me.