nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:58:05 -0600
Once upon a time, Byron Hicks <bhicks () ots utsystem edu> said:
4k video feeds (the new High Def): compressed: 1Gb/s
?? Current over-the-air HD (at a max of 1080i) is up to 19 megabits per second (and most don't run it that high). Most cable systems compress it more. 4k video is roughly 8 times the pixels than 1080i, but is typically going to be compressed with better algorithms (MPEG4 is roughly half the size of MPEG2), which would mean 4k video (at TV quality) would be around 100 megabits per second. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Justin Shore (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Dan White (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive JC Dill (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Adams (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Hills (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Dan White (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Michael Holstein (Dec 01)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Deepak Jain (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive James Bensley (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 01)