nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:33:20 -0500
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dan White <dwhite () olp net> wrote:
All valid points. Deploying a strand to each customer from the CO/Cabinet is a good way to future proof your plant.
I would argue that every customer is entitled to duplex fiber. Drive Slow, Paul Wall
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive, (continued)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive JC Dill (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Adams (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Byron Hicks (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Chris Hills (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Michael Holstein (Dec 01)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Deepak Jain (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive James Bensley (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Will Clayton (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Rod Beck (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Curtis Maurand (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Mackinnon, Ian (Dec 02)