nanog mailing list archives

Re: FTTH Active vs Passive


From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:59:46 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Dan White wrote:

However, there are some advantages to GPON - particularly if you're
deploying high bandwidth video services. PON ONTs share 2.4Gb/s of
bandwidth downstream, which means you can support more than a gig of video
on each PON, if deploying in dense mode.

You don't need to supply more than a gig per household, so active gige (or 100meg) is enough to feed the household with their broadcast video needs. So yes, you will need 10GE to the node and 100/1000 to each household do this this kind of video.

PON only makes sense with low take-rates and high per-truckroll costs when I did the business case last time.

Another big advantage is in CO equipment. A 4-PON blade in a cabinet is
going to support on the order of 256 ONTs.

But you lose out on the CPEs, at least historically these were much more expensive than the 100FX/TX media converters available in the market.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


Current thread: