nanog mailing list archives

Re: IGMP and PIM protection

From: Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:43:07 +0530


I think OP meant that he only wants an integrity check of the control
traffic, not confidentiality, hence the statement that he does not want to
encrypt the control traffic.


Yes, thats correct.

Kent


Stefan Fouant
www.shortestpathfirst.net
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D

Current thread:

Re: IGMP and PIM protection, (continued)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Peter Hicks (Dec 23)
  - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
    - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
  - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
    - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
    - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
    - RE: IGMP and PIM protection Stefan Fouant (Dec 23)
    - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Anton Kapela (Dec 23)
    - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
    - Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection David Barak (Dec 23)