nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGMP and PIM protection
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:47:24 +0530
Would encrypting multicast not fundamentally break the concept of multicast itself, unless you're encrypting multicast traffic over a backbone?
No, i wasnt alluding to encrypting the multicast traffic. I was thinking of using ESP-NULL (AH is optional) for the IGMP/PIM packets. Affably, Kent
Current thread:
- IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Peter Hicks (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
- RE: IGMP and PIM protection Stefan Fouant (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Anton Kapela (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Peter Hicks (Dec 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection David Barak (Dec 23)