nanog mailing list archives
RE: IGMP and PIM protection
From: "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant () shortestpathfirst net>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:24:59 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm () emanon com] Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:27 AM To: Glen Kent Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IGMP and PIM protection But IGMP IS the control traffic with users. And PIM IS the control traffic between multicast routers.
I think OP meant that he only wants an integrity check of the control traffic, not confidentiality, hence the statement that he does not want to encrypt the control traffic. Stefan Fouant www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D
Current thread:
- IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Peter Hicks (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Dobbins, Roland (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Scott Morris (Dec 23)
- RE: IGMP and PIM protection Stefan Fouant (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Anton Kapela (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Glen Kent (Dec 23)
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection Peter Hicks (Dec 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IGMP and PIM protection David Barak (Dec 23)