nanog mailing list archives
Re: Chinese bgp metering story
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:01:54 -0600
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Fred Baker <fred () cisco com> wrote:
On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:And don't be so hard on the ITU folks, the only thing they want to break is the monopoly of IP address allocation.With all due respect, they don't want to break said monopoly, assuming one agrees that it is a monopoly (I think there's a lot more to the story than that, but that's another discussion). They want to *be* said monopoly.
Indeed !!! I was being sarcastic, I was watching live the last IGF meeting when by proxy ICANN's CEO got grilled with the question about IPv6 address allocation. Jorge
Current thread:
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story, (continued)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Joel Jaeggli (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- RE: Chinese bgp metering story Deepak Jain (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- RE: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Fred Baker (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Jorge Amodio (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Fred Baker (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Jorge Amodio (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story John Levine (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story tvest (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Williams, Marc (Dec 18)