nanog mailing list archives
Re: Chinese bgp metering story
From: Fred Baker <fred () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:53:56 -0800
On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
And don't be so hard on the ITU folks, the only thing they want to break is the monopoly of IP address allocation.
With all due respect, they don't want to break said monopoly, assuming one agrees that it is a monopoly (I think there's a lot more to the story than that, but that's another discussion). They want to *be* said monopoly.
Current thread:
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story, (continued)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Randy Bush (Dec 20)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Joel Jaeggli (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- RE: Chinese bgp metering story Deepak Jain (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- RE: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Fred Baker (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Jorge Amodio (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Fred Baker (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Jorge Amodio (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story John Levine (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story tvest (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Williams, Marc (Dec 18)