nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:14:16 -0500
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:58:48 CST, Will Clayton said:
enable the masses to communicate and, at the same time, appease, for lack of a better word, those who would capitalize on the sheer lack of unified infrastructure.
The same way we appeased them the *last* time we gave them incentives to deploy true high-capacity broadband, of course...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive, (continued)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Curtis Maurand (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Michael Holstein (Dec 02)
- RE: FTTH Active vs Passive Holmes,David A (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Jack Bates (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Alexander Harrowell (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Delian Delchev (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Robert Mathews (OSIA) (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Dan White (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Scott Brown/Clack/ESD (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Jared Mauch (Dec 01)