nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:36:51 -0500
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Paul Wall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dan White <dwhite () olp net> wrote:All valid points. Deploying a strand to each customer from the CO/Cabinet is a good way to future proof your plant.I would argue that every customer is entitled to duplex fiber.
I'll settle with fiber within 2km of my home right now. If people have recommendations for FTTH/GPON/Whatnot let me know. Right now, I'm thinking stuff like this is cool: http://www.provantage.com/zyxel-mc1000sfp~7ZYXS00C.htm I suspect one could do interesting things with BX10/LX10 SFPs. (Likely not with cisco though). - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive, (continued)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Alexander Harrowell (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Delian Delchev (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Robert Mathews (OSIA) (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Dan White (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Scott Brown/Clack/ESD (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Jared Mauch (Dec 01)