nanog mailing list archives
Re: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:12:29 +0000
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:33:20PM -0500, Paul Wall wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dan White <dwhite () olp net> wrote:All valid points. Deploying a strand to each customer from the CO/Cabinet is a good way to future proof your plant.I would argue that every customer is entitled to duplex fiber. Drive Slow, Paul Wall
nifty... my own fiber pair - and I'll run 32 lambdas on each... (can I has kewl new rare-earth glass ... so I can run 100G per lambda? - plz?) --bill
Current thread:
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive, (continued)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Jack Bates (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Alexander Harrowell (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Delian Delchev (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Fletcher Kittredge (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Robert Mathews (OSIA) (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Dan White (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Scott Brown/Clack/ESD (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive bmanning (Dec 01)
- Re: FTTH Active vs Passive Jared Mauch (Dec 01)