nanog mailing list archives

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband


From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:29:20 -0400

In a message written on Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:19:50AM -0500, Jack Bates wrote:
Looking at just Oklahoma, I'm not sure AT&T could get even 200kb to 
every household for $200b.

For an interesting set of cost comparisons....

In most locations every home has electrical service.  What's the
cost per household?

Most houses have a statem maintained road in front of them, what
is the cost per household?

Many (although a lower number) of "city" water and sewer, what is
the cost per household?

For a number of reasons I would expect Broadband to be cheaper than any
of those, per household; but should definately not exceed any of them in
cost.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: