nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband
From: Stephen Sprunk <stephen () sprunk org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:17:43 -0500
Jack Bates wrote:
Roy wrote:The problem that the FCC faces is making a realistic definition that can apply to the whole US and not just cities.
If I'm reading this question right, the issue is that Congress appropriated some pork for "rural broadband" and now it's up to the FCC to guess what Congress intended that to mean so they can determine which applicants will be allowed to feed at the public trough. I'd say that most laymen currently consider "broadband" to be an always-on service at 1Mb/s or faster, regardless of the particular technology used. FTTH sounds attractive, but there's just not enough pork to actually do it for a non-trivial number of rural homes; it's barely feasible for (sub)urban homes. FTTC is the only realistic option, with the last mile being either existing copper or existing coax. The "curb" has a slightly different meaning in a rural area, of course, but that doesn't need to be specified in the definition anyway.
How does fiber (home or curb) figure in the rural sections of the country?It figures in nicely, thank you. Of course, our definition of curb might be 1.5 miles further than your definition. ;) 2 miles is the cutoff for > 10mb/s reliability, but to deal with future stuff, most of my telco customers have dropped it down to 1.5 miles.
My ILEC's techs claim they can run VDSL2 several miles but lose about 1Mb/s per 1000ft from the head end. Luckily I'm about 1500ft from mine, and my line tested out at ~58Mb/s -- though they'll only sell me 10Mb/s of that for data and 25Mb/s of it for TV. It's amazing how far we've come in the last two decades since I got my first 2400bps modem. If VDSL2 can't go far enough for rural areas and/or would require more remote units than is feasible, I'd say that ADSL is fast enough that it should also qualify. Supporting triple-play should not be a requirement, IMHO, as customers can always use DBS for TV and most people who claim to have "broadband" today don't have or can't get triple-play. I wouldn't go as far as accepting ISDN/IDSL, though, if anyone is even still selling that junk. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband, (continued)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Alexander Harrowell (Aug 27)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Leo Bicknell (Aug 26)
- RE: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Carlos Alcantar (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Fred Baker (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband jim deleskie (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Joel Esler (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Roy (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Stephen Sprunk (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Fred Baker (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Robert Enger - NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 26)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Robert E. Seastrom (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband deleskie (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Dorn Hetzel (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Daniel Senie (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Jack Bates (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Chris Adams (Aug 28)
- Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband Andrew Carey (Aug 28)