nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 Anycast?

From: Shin SHIRAHATA <true () sfc wide ad jp>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:17:18 +0900

192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32 are some
notable examples of heterogeneous origin AS.


And those prefixes (6to4 & Teredo) all come with annoying problems as
one never knows which relay is really being used and it is hard to debug
how the packets really flow.


I agree entirely. 

As a one of 6to4 relay operator (AS38646), I  believe coordination among 
6to4 and Teredo operators is needed.

Does anyone know is there any operators group who are using 
192.88.99.0/24, 2002::/16, and 2001::/32?

---
No caffeine, No work. 
Shin SHIRAHATA <shin () shirahata name> / <true () sfc wide ad jp>

Current thread:

Re: IPv4 Anycast?, (continued)
- - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Zhenkai Zhu (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? kris foster (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Nathan Ward (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
    - RE: IPv4 Anycast? Fouant, Stefan (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Zhenkai Zhu (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Kevin Loch (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jeroen Massar (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Shin SHIRAHATA (Apr 22)
    - IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ;) (Was: IPv4 Anycast?) Jeroen Massar (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ; ) (Was: IPv4 Anycast?) Shin SHIRAHATA (Apr 23)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Joe Provo (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Rob Evans (Apr 22)
    - Re: IPv4 Anycast? Zhenkai Zhu (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? bmanning (Apr 22)