nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 Anycast?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:13:38 -0500
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I was under the impression anycast services with homogeneous origin AS was far more common than the heterogeneous. Almost all the instances I know of use homogeneous origin AS.I'd be interested in statistics either way.
The original question provides a good statistic, I think. Only 8 prefixes that were announced by more than 3 origin AS.
Jack
Current thread:
- RE: IPv4 Anycast?, (continued)
- RE: IPv4 Anycast? Fouant, Stefan (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Zhenkai Zhu (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Kevin Loch (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jeroen Massar (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Shin SHIRAHATA (Apr 22)
- IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ;) (Was: IPv4 Anycast?) Jeroen Massar (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ; ) (Was: IPv4 Anycast?) Shin SHIRAHATA (Apr 23)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Joe Provo (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Rob Evans (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Zhenkai Zhu (Apr 22)