nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 Anycast?
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:36:25 -0400
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:13:38PM -0500, Jack Bates wrote: [snip]
The original question provides a good statistic, I think. Only 8 prefixes that were announced by more than 3 origin AS.
And the overall message is that only the (prefix holder|originating ASn[s]) can tell you if it is intended or not. Sadly, this is not a useful metric for a third-party to use to determine prefix annoucnement legitimacy. Perhaps an update to RPSL to allow for intentional multiple origins is overdue? [insert thread about folks who do/don't use tools regardless of appropriateness] -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 Anycast?, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Zhenkai Zhu (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Kevin Loch (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jeroen Massar (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Shin SHIRAHATA (Apr 22)
- IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ;) (Was: IPv4 Anycast?) Jeroen Massar (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv6 Operators List (which also covers 6to4 operation ; ) (Was: IPv4 Anycast?) Shin SHIRAHATA (Apr 23)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Joe Provo (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Rob Evans (Apr 22)
- Re: IPv4 Anycast? Zhenkai Zhu (Apr 22)